The deal has indeed been the subject of heated debates and political disputes in recent months, with the president refusing to approve the deal before the end of his term, with a fundamental rights petition against the signing of the deal being submitted to the Supreme Court, and even staging a protest almost earlier this week. Togo is an interesting case, because it belongs to the other parties to the next regional pact. However, we don`t expect it to be selected for a compact fit this year. Togo was selected for the threshold program in fiscal year 2016, but program development was delayed due to concerns about the government`s crackdown on protesters. Although the MCC and the Togolese government signed an agreement on an emerging program earlier this year, the agency will likely want to see how the partnership develops before considering the transition to a pact. He is likely to want to continue to monitor the government environment, especially given recent delays in scheduled elections and a constitutional ruling that allows the president (who has been in power since 2005, when he succeeded his father) to run for re-election for life. The main points of contention focus on the question: where does the money go and what does this funding mean? According to the publicly available draft agreement, MCC is providing this subsidy to address two of Sri Lanka`s “constraining constraints” on economic growth: (a) inadequate infrastructure and transport logistics planning, and (b) lack of access to land for agriculture, services and industrial investors. In law, only low- and middle-income countries can apply for MCC support. Once a country has a top middle income, it can no longer compete for financing.

This year, Kosovo, which would have been re-elected while it is in the process of drafting a pact, has moved to an upper middle income and cannot be re-elected. It is not very common for a country to “graduate” from the candidacy in the midst of compact development – this has only happened twice – but it has always been somewhat controversial. Anyone with questions about what MCC is – or isn`t – can get these facts, all the background and data related to MCC in Nepal and a lot of information about lately Nepalese citizens, politicians and media representatives have been asking about the Millennium Challenge Compact (MCC) in Nepal. We welcome your questions and the commitment of the Nepalese public to understand the benefits that the program would bring to Nepal as the MCC has been established as a new model of international development based on transparency and true partnership. This is a standard guarantee characteristic of international aid agreements that ensure that grant money is used exclusively to achieve the objectives of the Pact and does not fall into the wrong hands. However, after reviewing publicly available information resources, the MCC grant does not involve a lease or transfer of ownership of Sri Lankan land and does not require Sri Lanka to repay the grant amounts, unless the agreement is expressly violated. Late last month, in a major breakthrough, Sri Lanka`s Cabinet of Ministers approved the implementation of the Millennium Challenge Corporation`s (MCC) $480 million grant and released the final draft grant agreement for public review. Other concerns regarding the construction of a physical economic corridor, links to the SOFA and ACSA agreements, the acquisition of Sri Lankan land by the U.S.

government, undervalued land deals, the establishment of U.S. settlements and/or military bases, the construction of electric fences, and the destruction of the local environment were also confirmed as unfounded in the review of the agreement. .